Yep, nothing to worry about there. There's no chance it'll ever be used to censor free speech, restrict the actions and organization of an opposing political movement, or shut down communication across the nation or globe while a coup d'état takes place and the new masters entrench and secure their power. Big Brother tells me not to worry, and Big Brother's never lied to me before - or at least, if he did, and I posted accusations or proof of it here, he might eventually get the proposed NCCC to shut down this website. So, it's just better for all of us if I say he's never lied to me. Because he hasn't ever lied to me. I promise.U.S. Government Proposes "Internet Kill Switch"
The proposed legislation ... would compel any internet providers, search engines or software companies, at the discretion of the U.S. government, to "immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed" by the Department of Homeland Security.
...
The bill would give a newly-formed National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications the authority to monitor the "security status" of private websites, ISPs and other net-related business within the U.S. as well as critical internet components in other countries. Companies would be required to take part in "information sharing" with the government and certify to the NCCC that they have implemented approved security measures. Furthermore, any company that "relies on" the internet, telephone system or any other part of the U.S. "information infrastructure" would also be "subject to command" by the NCCC under the proposed new law.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Surely this could never be abused..?
This is just naturally a great idea, and clearly meant only to shield us all from the next 9/11. The government only wants the ability to suspend the internet, or specific sites, in the case of a legitimate emergency. There's no way that could be abused...
Labels:
censorship,
conspiracy theory,
law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Maybe lead tainted toys aren't the only things being imported from China.
Apparently this administration has imported Chinese ideas on free speech and the internet too.
Absolutely a terrible idea. But even worse, from the tech standpoint, is the idea that you'd BUILD IN this method for turning off the system. Because for it to work "right," it couldn't depend on human intervention. If I read this excerpt right, part of the purpose would be to cut off technological intrusions too -- sites that were compromised could be cut off by shutting off nodes near them, right?
Haven't these people ever watched ONE bad science fiction movie? This is why you don't build a self-destruct switch.
Post a Comment