data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9084/f9084f02587234bd3a6c2f078eb81f69289b8d74" alt=""
Dissing Land of the Lost is like dissing Metropolis or Citizen Kane or Wizard Of Oz or Gone With The Wind or Casablanca or BladeRunner.
They all have faults, and seem almost cliche because of how often they've been aped. There's even one on that list that I don't personally care for. But if you're focusing on those faults, you're missing the point (as I no doubt did the one time I saw Gone With The Wind).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38df2/38df2b919fb783667d0419f3893652224a4295cb" alt=""
Dissing Land of the Lost is like dissing Rocky Horror because Tim Curry and Susan Sarandon are capable of much more believable and emotionally gripping performances.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b045b/b045bd441aeac5ec13766caa7c249e42efb8cb83" alt=""
Compared to modern technical expectations, the effects leave something to be desired. But the effects were revolutionary in their day, and pretty damn good for a weekly half-hour kids show in the 70s. Remember, this was before the era of CGI, motion capture, and digital color timing. It was all puppets, clay, and bluescreen superimposing.
On a related note - they only had three Sleestack suits. There's some incredible editing where they give you the feeling that the Marshalls are fighting off dozens of Sleestacks. I had to read it online to catch it - if it weren't for wikipedia, I'd still be assuming they must have made at least a dozen Sleestack suits. But if you watch carefully, it's all done with never more than 3 on screen. It's genius that they managed to present a community of hundreds just 3 at a time.
The concepts / ideas in Land of the Lost have never sucked. (Well, the "goodbye Rick, hello Uncle Jack" transition could have been handled better - but that was a problem of lawyers and agents, not screenwriters and directors.) The vast majority of the plots and concepts were and remain awesome. They were written by scifi luminaries such as Larry Niven, David Gerrold, DC Fontana, Norman Spinrad, Ben Bova, and Theodore Sturgeon.
Bonus: Here's a very thorough review of the DVD release by someone else who finds much to love about it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caad5/caad5c7a1fe242cb3fb0d31652dd20bc8787562a" alt=""
In closing: To each their own - Brad will likely disagree with most of what I've said. :) To that, I offer one final defense: Whatever else you can say about Land of the Lost, at least the Sleestack's spines don't glow inexplicably when they get some. To me, that's important.
4 comments:
amen. that show kicked so much ass on so many levels. they don't make 'em like that anymore. damn kids.
Sure, their spines don't glow...
I must admit to never seeing the original. I thought the 90s was the original. The 90s version really sucked. I would be willing to bet the original sucked as well. I do like the story and idea behind Land of the Lost but I have suck a thin skin for bad acting and poor costumes. It ruins even the best of stories for me.
Also I HATE rocky horror. I watched it once (and maybe a half) and was moderately entertained. I never need to see it again.
Have you seen American Astronaut? It is so terrible. My brother loves it and it makes me cry. When they zap someone with the ray gun the actually toss sand into the frame where the person used to be so it looks like they were fried. Netflix it. It is it's own unique, painful, nasty thing.
Rocky Horror should never have been released to video. It was only fun as a theatrical event with lots of crazy people in costume shouting back at the screen and singing along. Oh, and the virgin auctions. What is Rocky Horror without a virgin auction?
Post a Comment